|
Post by Strider on Aug 25, 2009 18:13:54 GMT -5
Round 1
Strider: 6 Killa: 1
Round 2
Strider: 15 Killa: 6
GG.
|
|
|
Post by TheLegendaryBroly on Aug 25, 2009 19:03:56 GMT -5
OMG RAPED by strider
|
|
|
Post by killaserpant on Aug 25, 2009 19:27:27 GMT -5
yea he beat me,but we only played warrior.i knew going in he was going to beat my warrior.he is a way better warrior than me .very accurate wit that throwing axe.had to chase him around alot though.next time we play all classes.if u think nightgodbroly is better than u as warrior xxstrider then i dont want no parts of his.but if not then ill try him out.gg
|
|
|
Post by TheLegendaryBroly on Aug 26, 2009 1:36:33 GMT -5
o my a warrior 1v1? hmmm my warrior is weak
|
|
|
Post by demonstouch on Aug 26, 2009 8:34:59 GMT -5
Yea Brolys warrior sucks, Killa you need to battle him... Put Broly in his place. His archer is even worse.
Go Killa ..... lol
|
|
|
Post by BulgarianMenace on Aug 26, 2009 11:04:44 GMT -5
broly has one of the best warriors in middle earth.
|
|
|
Post by thebountyhunter on Aug 26, 2009 11:12:07 GMT -5
sarcasm fail
|
|
|
Post by BulgarianMenace on Aug 26, 2009 11:25:52 GMT -5
no, I just didn't want killa wasting his time. It would just be 15-0.
|
|
|
Post by TheLegendaryBroly on Aug 26, 2009 11:45:11 GMT -5
lol might be 15-1 or 2 if i have low health but yeah best warrior in middle earth my archer is just..........unspoken of that is all & im not gonna waste my time going 1 on 1 with someone who thinks hes the best......Im Legend Baby!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Strider on Aug 26, 2009 11:48:14 GMT -5
Eh, Killa would get him a few times; he's not THAT bad. But I would be surprised if he manged to kill him more than twice. He managed to get me six times because I was messing around with aerial attacks and trying out some other techniques - I get bored playing 1v1's. But...yeah...Broly probably has the best Warrior in the game.
|
|
|
Post by hanzrimer on Aug 26, 2009 12:02:03 GMT -5
I think Warrior 1 vs 1 doesn't really determine who the better warrior is. The tactics used in 1 vs 1 don't really work when playing a real game. Like you can't just run around till the right moment comes like I see in most 1 vs 1's. In a real battle you don't have that luxury. I think thats why I stopped playing 1 vs 1, my game is just so adapted to playing full games and going in full force. And if I die it's no big deal I'll just respawn.
|
|
|
Post by BulgarianMenace on Aug 26, 2009 13:13:55 GMT -5
no johns hanz.
1v1s are a good test of skill because there are no interruptions, no random attacks from teammates to bail you out. It's just you and your opponent. When you get in an 8v8 if you can handle yourself in a 1v1 those skills will translate to the 8v8 as well.
The only thing is that scouts as a class are ill adept at handling 1v1s, and I would say only in their case is a 1v1 not necessarily an accurate representation of a scout's skill.
|
|
|
Post by Joppi on Aug 26, 2009 13:40:49 GMT -5
I would say only in their case is a 1v1 not necessarily an accurate representation of a scout's skill. Uh, archers? Archer 1v1s end the instant a fire/poison arrow hits, unless it's at an extreme distance, in which case the person who has the better position wins. Hardly representative of a good archer's talents.
|
|
|
Post by demonstouch on Aug 26, 2009 13:57:56 GMT -5
Yea archer in osgalth its all about whos on the bridge, boring....
|
|
|
Post by matgordo on Aug 26, 2009 14:25:12 GMT -5
I agree with BM. Since I started working on 1v1s my kill count in regular games has increased dramatically. It definitely makes you a better player all around.
|
|