|
Post by straightcash5 on Mar 19, 2010 13:01:08 GMT -5
i agree, i think fob is an excellent player, and did i say i'd take gow over broly? no. broly is by far the best player this game has ever seen. but neither his, shadows or fob who i think never plays mage, have a really good mage, gow is really good at every class, no one else is. shadow and broly are both still better players.
as for pooks i said 2 because if your a good archer you know how to use your surroundings, no archer always kills another good archer in 1 shot. also pooks doesn't have off days, and in the first battle against you guys pooks did just as good as shadow and joppi, people even commented on how those 3 were beasts that battle. i've been in servers plenty of times with pooks and shadow and pooks easily does just as good if not better, i will say shadow fights very smart with archer, you hardly ever see him out in the open. pooks stays out in the open and gets right in everyones face with archer, and is still the hardest archer to kill
|
|
|
Post by BulgarianMenace on Mar 19, 2010 13:06:11 GMT -5
shadow's mage is really, really good. Broly doesn't play mage often but his mage is good as well (and really, how can it not be with his understanding of the game and the ease of use of mages). Fob's mage is good too.
And I haven't seen gow's archer do anything special. His scout and warrior are very good, and his mage is good.
The difference between pookz and badger is this: I see pookz aiming in my general direction and I'll keep fighting until he hits me (which can take some time, though he will eventually). I see badger and if I even try to keep fighting I get headshotted immediately. Joppi on his good days is the same as shadow, on his medium days is equal to pookz, and on his bad days...he's about as good as you.
|
|
|
Post by jenaez on Mar 19, 2010 13:11:31 GMT -5
shadow's mage is really, really good. Broly doesn't play mage often but his mage is good as well (and really, how can it not be with his understanding of the game and the ease of use of mages). Fob's mage is good too. And I haven't seen gow's archer do anything special. His scout and warrior are very good, and his mage is good. The difference between pookz and badger is this: I see pookz aiming in my general direction and I'll keep fighting until he hits me (which can take some time, though he will eventually). I see badger and if I even try to keep fighting I get headshotted immediately. Joppi on his good days is the same as shadow, on his medium days is equal to pookz, and on his bad days...he's about as good as you. I never saw fob playing bcuz he hates using mage (i think the same) but i seen shadow using mage a couple of time and he's really good, im not saying he can beat you 2 but his mage is close to be elite
|
|
|
Post by straightcash5 on Mar 19, 2010 13:17:36 GMT -5
well thats what happens to you. i have more trouble with pooks then i do shadow, and part of the reason you may worry more when shadow is shooting at you is because he's behind a wall or a shield (which is smart) pooks is out in the open and focuses on multiple people while having to avoid taking damage, as shadow is normally in a more comfortable situation, i have more problems with pooks, so thats why i think he is.
|
|
|
Post by straightcash5 on Mar 19, 2010 13:20:23 GMT -5
i haven't seen shadow play mage much, but if you 2 say he is really good then thats not hard to believe, the guy's nasty. and if he is, then him and gow can both say that they can play every class at a high level, and in my opinon are the only 2 that can
|
|
|
Post by jenaez on Mar 19, 2010 13:22:27 GMT -5
i haven't seen shadow play mage much, but if you 2 say he is really good then thats not hard to believe, the guy's nasty. and if he is, then him and gow can both say that they can play every class at a high level, and in my opinon are the only 2 that can Agreed.
|
|
|
Post by BulgarianMenace on Mar 19, 2010 13:24:12 GMT -5
Where the archer is relative to my mage (whether he's behind cover or not) doesn't influence how I react to them shooting at me because I can't reach them anyway. All that matters is how good their accuracy is, and there is no archer more accurate than badger.
|
|
|
Post by BulgarianMenace on Mar 19, 2010 13:28:43 GMT -5
and really, if you step back for a moment
IF you're right, and
pookz > shadow and joppi grad > bauer you = me gow = jenaez
Then you guys would have done a lot better. You would have won a mode, maybe. Or more than one game total in a match, which is the best you were able to do.
You didn't, so you're clearly wrong. You overestimate your players. If you guys had actually won something then your words might carry some actual weight, but as it is they're just a bunch of hot air.
|
|
|
Post by straightcash5 on Mar 19, 2010 14:01:06 GMT -5
pookz didn't play... i did better then you in tdm, you did a little better in ctr, so =. being that in clan battles gow plays the same 2 classes as jenaez for the most part it's jenaez > gow. though i believe that they played pretty evenly in the battle. we did have close matches, won one, was short almost all of riven, and the random gave up 1 of your last 4 kills, pellinor, short our best archer and only lost by 1. so for the most part i'm right about those people. like i said, we have 3 players at that level, you have 4, and we only had 2 in that match so we actually played better then we should have
|
|
|
Post by BulgarianMenace on Mar 19, 2010 14:28:06 GMT -5
LOL. I'll type out a long post about how delusional you are later. But for now, just LOL.
P.S. you still got raped
|
|
|
Post by TheLegendaryBroly on Mar 19, 2010 15:15:31 GMT -5
Broly > all discussion ended
|
|
|
Post by straightcash5 on Mar 19, 2010 15:17:32 GMT -5
Broly > all discussion ended i agree lol
|
|
|
Post by Joppi on Mar 19, 2010 15:41:54 GMT -5
He's talking about the first match, where Pookz- did play and the results were almost exactly the same, minus the close matches (barring Mines). You were an archer most of the time, not a mage like BM. You guys won 2 matches total against us, we've won 10. The "close" matches, while close, usually involved us coming back from an 8-10 kill deficit. We also downright dominated you in two matches, which you never did to us ever. We did this all without one of our best players, and often fielding subs and new clan members, meaning that our coordination took a hit. The match results definitely do not point to the conclusions you're trying to make
|
|
|
Post by Willf_28 on Mar 19, 2010 15:57:09 GMT -5
You guys still arguing? I only played 3 matches against tm7 total, but they were obviously better in all the clan battles. As for whos better at archer, I dont see any of them on here arguing about it so why not just drop it? Ive faced all of the people you mention at archer and they are all very good. One archer will be better then the other in one match, then the next it could be the other way around. Either way its all opinion that doesnt really matter anymore since the game is done.
|
|
|
Post by TheLegendaryBroly on Mar 19, 2010 15:59:14 GMT -5
i love you joppi!!
|
|