|
Post by NexsusX (Fury) on Mar 3, 2010 16:47:22 GMT -5
hey its not unfair for the TM7 since we won our matches but for the teams that play CT and EVOD it might not be its like oh i have an awsome personso im going to play him here and there as i will ( you dont see Payton Manning playing for the colts and and the giants just because his brother is playing for the giants)
really i dont give a damn and it should be the other clans who should have a problem with this.
im also not to fond of subs myself yea even our team had to use some and though the excuse might be valid it doesnt make it right since they have their own clans
and it seems to me that in this situation you guys didnt even need to have subs since both of you were missing people ( playing a 6 on 6 match isnt going to affect the results so both teams guilty no matter how many finger pointing on who fault in the end both subed
this kinda reminds me of the cold war in which the soviets and US would use their influance and support to assist those who are ass kissing them but in reality they both countries ( US and USSR are fighting a phantom war with each other)
im sorry if this offends anyone but its the facts
|
|
|
Post by hanzrimer on Mar 3, 2010 16:56:04 GMT -5
this whole tournament has left with a bitter taste in my mouth, how would you like if your clan used subs while you were online and not asked even after you said in the thread you would play? my main regret i think is joining a clan that never used me, I guess too late now because the game is coming to an end.
|
|
|
Post by Strider on Mar 3, 2010 16:59:08 GMT -5
hey its not unfair for the TM7 since we won our matches but for the teams that play CT and EVOD it might not be its like oh i have an awsome personso im going to play him here and there as i will ( you dont see Payton Manning playing for the colts and and the giants just because his brother is playing for the giants) We've discussed this already. It wasn't like that. EVOD was short on players and they needed subs. It was even stated that if any of the ladies were to come on, they'd take the spots of the subs. After I subbed for them on Sunday, I was asked to hold an honorary position in EVOD (same with Cash) as a 'Samurai'. Though, it was all in fun - nothing serious. The ladies/real EVOD members still had precedence over us and we would only be asked if (AND ONLY IF) they were short on players.
|
|
|
Post by brave on Mar 3, 2010 17:01:39 GMT -5
The Braves are the only clan that dont use subs. We play whomever for the most part. I was excited about these clan wars, but now not so much. Yes, I played with Demon a few times, but Ive been in his clan for 3+ months.
|
|
|
Post by grad22au on Mar 3, 2010 17:13:37 GMT -5
actually the brave has used subs
|
|
|
Post by brave on Mar 3, 2010 17:20:54 GMT -5
When was that Grad? Not in the 2 months Ive been here. Not once.
|
|
|
Post by NexsusX (Fury) on Mar 3, 2010 17:21:18 GMT -5
hey its not unfair for the TM7 since we won our matches but for the teams that play CT and EVOD it might not be its like oh i have an awsome personso im going to play him here and there as i will ( you dont see Payton Manning playing for the colts and and the giants just because his brother is playing for the giants) We've discussed this already. It wasn't like that. EVOD was short on players and they needed subs. It was even stated that if any of the ladies were to come on, they'd take the spots of the subs. After I subbed for them on Sunday, I was asked to hold an honorary position in EVOD (same with Cash) as a 'Samurai'. Though, it was all in fun - nothing serious. The ladies/real EVOD members still had precedence over us and we would only be asked if (AND ONLY IF) they were short on players. then why were tm7 players in this match? if anything both sides didnt need to have subs in the end. and dont come and say omg randoms ( heros can be suicided once the apear) randoms to that extent ( aka two for each team wouldnt have influnced much in my opinion) . its not so hard to say hey can you not play 2 people
|
|
|
Post by NexsusX (Fury) on Mar 3, 2010 17:23:12 GMT -5
of course im just trying to interprit what bm said without having some one attacking and someone defending their words
theres a lot of issues on both sides but once the game ends i hope they go with it lol
|
|
|
Post by brave on Mar 3, 2010 17:32:11 GMT -5
It was just luck that happened to have 4 of the top 10 players as subs for these teams.
If a team (ANY TEAM) cant get enough clan members to have CLAN battles, they should forfeit. Honestly, I hate how some clans are so worried about being great, that they cant fill the 8 man roster.
Hey, what ever. Im just stating my 2 cents in the matter.
|
|
|
Post by Strider on Mar 3, 2010 17:36:44 GMT -5
We've discussed this already. It wasn't like that. EVOD was short on players and they needed subs. It was even stated that if any of the ladies were to come on, they'd take the spots of the subs. After I subbed for them on Sunday, I was asked to hold an honorary position in EVOD (same with Cash) as a 'Samurai'. Though, it was all in fun - nothing serious. The ladies/real EVOD members still had precedence over us and we would only be asked if (AND ONLY IF) they were short on players. then why were tm7 players in this match? if anything both sides didnt need to have subs in the end. and dont come and say omg randoms ( heros can be suicided once the apear) randoms to that extent ( aka two for each team wouldnt have influnced much in my opinion) . its not so hard to say hey can you not play 2 people TM7 players were in the match because Demon asked them to sub for him. I don't think that they were all aware that Demon had other players (or at least one other player) to bring in. And 'randoms' can affect the match - in a HUGE way. Besides, subs were allowed (as they should be) before all of this nonsense started. of course im just trying to interprit what bm said without having some one attacking and someone defending their words theres a lot of issues on both sides but once the game ends i hope they go with it lol I don't think you were attacked - at all. I just told you exactly what happened. Basically, there's no need for any of this drama. Clans should be able to use subs if they're short on players. Obviously, I don't condone using subs if you have enough clan members to field.
|
|
|
Post by hanzrimer on Mar 3, 2010 17:38:22 GMT -5
It was just luck that happened to have 4 of the top 10 players as subs for these teams. If a team (ANY TEAM) cant get enough clan members to have CLAN battles, they should forfeit. Honestly, I hate how some clans are so worried about being great, that they cant fill the 8 man roster. Hey, what ever. Im just stating my 2 cents in the matter. both teams used subs but both teams didn't have to
|
|
|
Post by Strider on Mar 3, 2010 17:43:38 GMT -5
It was just luck that happened to have 4 of the top 10 players as subs for these teams. If a team (ANY TEAM) cant get enough clan members to have CLAN battles, they should forfeit. Honestly, I hate how some clans are so worried about being great, that they cant fill the 8 man roster.Hey, what ever. Im just stating my 2 cents in the matter. + I'd be fine with that if it had been stated before the tournment began. But, honestly, I don't think it's that serious. Win or lose, I just want to have fun - and play some great matches. I agree with your second sentence.
|
|
|
Post by NexsusX (Fury) on Mar 3, 2010 17:46:49 GMT -5
hey compared to a random you straight bm joppi fob influence the game more lololol
|
|
|
Post by straightcash5 on Mar 3, 2010 17:47:09 GMT -5
well EA if winng by forfeit satisfies you then ok, but i think most people would play subs so they can still have the battle and not waste everybodies time and have fun.
as far as DQing CT, does not make any sense, we had nothin to do with this, and you've known that ouphe was in both clans since before the tournament started, if you had a problem with it, then you should have said something about it before the tournament started and this wouldn't be a problem
|
|
|
Post by King of the Pink Mushrooms on Mar 3, 2010 17:47:23 GMT -5
Ok here's my view on a few things. From what I gatherd TM7 having subs is ok becuase they already have good enough player to win? Well I'm sure there are players not in there clan which they would fancy in there starting 8. So this isn't true. Next point cash and strider were just subs yes they are super subs but when you see your freinds list who's online are you gona pick your worst 2 freinds or your best. This is always going to be the case if freinds are allowed. Evod and CT members are in the focus here when DT are the ones who used subs when they had players online which was not right. Last point you can not disqualify someone for being in multiple clans when this was not mentioned at the start. Rules must be consistent through out a tournement hence it wrong to disqualify clans for it now. Last point lotrconquest is coming to a end let's just have fun and play hey? Oh yeah randoms won't work as they will muck up the teams.
|
|