|
Post by madwarrior on Sept 18, 2010 15:06:56 GMT -5
Big difference between warriors and mages. 4 noob mages can win a fight against 4 really good warriors anytime. a sea of firewalls can bring any warriors to their knees. imagine a warrior trying to kill a mage and that mage got healed by the team mate mage and how can another warrior heal another warrior? Don't tell me mages are equal to warriors, being a good warrior takes a lot of skills and being a good mage takes an hour to master. mages are boring to play but very effective. Another thing is the shield of mages with 4 mage a shield are mostly up all the time so it's hard to use the axe to get closer to the mage if you do get closer to get a kill, a shockwave from the other mages will knock you down and firewalled you to death from there. again mages are boring to play, what if everybody plays as mage? this game would be so boring.
|
|
|
Post by jenaez on Sept 18, 2010 15:25:04 GMT -5
Big difference between warriors and mages. 4 noob mages can win a fight against 4 really good warriors anytime. a sea of firewalls can bring any warriors to their knees. imagine a warrior trying to kill a mage and that mage got healed by the team mate mage and how can another warrior heal another warrior? Don't tell me mages are equal to warriors, being a good warrior takes a lot of skills and being a good mage takes an hour to master. mages are boring to play but very effective. You are joke, period. Using your own words, dont tell me mages are broken and easy to learned to use it, the only class i never learned to use at his potential was the mage. If you think you skills and knowledge about classes are over mine you should take a look to the awards and count how many time you saw my name, or the scout strategy guide i made. BTW you want to know why in the clan war we used 4 mages, just check all the archers score and now imagine how the score could be without shields Peace Out scrub
|
|
|
Post by straightcash5 on Sept 18, 2010 15:56:35 GMT -5
see now, there are to many people like you who like to call a mage great or a MASTER as you call it just because they understand the basics of the class. if that were true then no certain mages would stand out at all and you wouldn't hear people talking about who is the best, and those who are considered the best wouldn't outplay the other mages consistently or beat them in 1v1's if they weren't better. thus being a good mage doesn't mean your a great mage, so there has to be some skill involved.
as for the 4v4 mages vs warriors that is just stupid of you to even mention. in a 8v8 clan battle the chances of that ever happening are beyond slim. like i said earlier, if you have good warriors to BREAK the shields, not kill them then that leaves a gap for archers and mages on there team to take advantage of and rack up kills.i don't care if they have 6 mages, you can still beat them with a good strategy and as long as you got good warriors and scouts you can ALWAYS break there shields
|
|
|
Post by Mithrand!r on Sept 18, 2010 16:03:45 GMT -5
Big difference between warriors and mages. 4 noob mages can win a fight against 4 really good warriors anytime....and being a good mage takes an hour to master. This is just SO RIDICULOUS.
|
|
|
Post by straightcash5 on Sept 18, 2010 16:05:47 GMT -5
i know it works because my clan won battles against clans that had more mages then us. like i said, if you have any versatility then it wouldn't be that much of a problem.
i like how you completely ignore my post about how archers are no better.
|
|
|
Post by BulgarianMenace on Sept 18, 2010 16:09:55 GMT -5
BTW you want to know why in the clan war we used 4 mages, just check all the archers score and now imagine how the score could be without shields Peace Out scrub WIN. The best point made in this whole thread; archers are so beast you NEED to have those mages for SUPPORT. It's the archers that such a powerful force. Think about it, if you took away archers, or warriors, or scout, mages would get a slight boost but overall it wouldn't change how well they do too much. But if you take away mages shields archers would be gods. A team full of archer would be unstoppable, and this game would turn into a shooter with only one class.
|
|
|
Post by jenaez on Sept 18, 2010 16:18:28 GMT -5
BTW you want to know why in the clan war we used 4 mages, just check all the archers score and now imagine how the score could be without shields Peace Out scrub WIN. The best point made in this whole thread; archers are so beast you NEED to have those mages for SUPPORT. It's the archers that such a powerful force. Think about it, if you took away archers, or warriors, or scout, mages would get a slight boost but overall it wouldn't change how well they do too much. But if you take away mages shields archers would be gods. A team full of archer would be unstoppable, and this game would turn into a shooter with only one class. I'm still the best
|
|
|
Post by madwarrior on Sept 18, 2010 16:30:14 GMT -5
WIN. The best point made in this whole thread; archers are so beast you NEED to have those mages for SUPPORT. It's the archers that such a powerful force. Think about it, if you took away archers, or warriors, or scout, mages would get a slight boost but overall it wouldn't change how well they do too much. But if you take away mages shields archers would be gods. A team full of archer would be unstoppable, and this game would turn into a shooter with only one class. I'm still the best that is why youre an idiot! I'm talking about mages, archers cannot do anything with 4 mages. again you're an idiot.
|
|
|
Post by jenaez on Sept 18, 2010 16:37:42 GMT -5
I thought finding someone more retarded than killa was impossible. You litteraly dont know a shit about this game, again you should see the score of the archers on the clan wars even with 4 mages, i can tell you they had 40+ with a couple of dead on every mode but TDM while everyone else had at best 25 (if you get lucky) with atleast 2o deaths. And your lack of argument of your post besides "stupid and mages r 4 NOOBZ" show that you are really a scrub. And again Im the Best
|
|
|
Post by madwarrior on Sept 18, 2010 17:14:47 GMT -5
4 warriors and 4 archers vs 4 mages and 4 archers. Who do you think will win? you're brain dead you idiot. archers poison will kill the warriors momentum easily killing them with the enemies mage or archer while the archer with mage gets a shield so the y could gun down the archer with the warriors. you get it idiot.
|
|
|
Post by straightcash5 on Sept 18, 2010 17:18:11 GMT -5
I'm still the best that is why youre an idiot! I'm talking about mages, archers cannot do anything with 4 mages. again you're an idiot. did you not read my post??? if your team is not a bunch of idiots then you'd have warriors breaking shields so your ARCHERS CAN DO SOMETHING. you seem to think it's always goin to be 4 mages vs 4 warriors or archers. in clan battles it's never like that, at least if your team isn't dumb you'd have a balanced attack. a balanced team will normally beat a team full of mages, unless they're very good mages. but even then they'd still lose. my god you are slow
|
|
|
Post by jenaez on Sept 18, 2010 17:24:40 GMT -5
4 warriors and 4 archers vs 4 mages and 4 archers. Who do you think will win? you're brain dead you idiot. archers poison will kill the warriors momentum easily killing them with the enemies mage or archer while the archer with mage gets a shield so the y could gun down the archer with the warriors. you get it idiot. Im LOLing right now ;D, Your logic is so stupid "U know 8 archers PwNz 8 scout". You clearly dont know a shit about this game, or CW enviroment or even classes basic so keep arguing with you is pointless. CYA scrub, maybe someday you will learn PS: BTW this is even worse than the ppl claming that HTDM is balanced and how is harder using archer there than in other game types. Im now again a visible user
|
|
|
Post by straightcash5 on Sept 18, 2010 17:29:29 GMT -5
4 warriors and 4 archers vs 4 mages and 4 archers. Who do you think will win? you're brain dead you idiot. archers poison will kill the warriors momentum easily killing them with the enemies mage or archer while the archer with mage gets a shield so the y could gun down the archer with the warriors. you get it idiot. omg dumb ass. clan battles never consist of just 2 classes per team. at least on ps3 they didn't. even if a team had 5 mages, they would still have at least people playing 3 of the 4 classes. not once do i remember a team having 4 and 4 of any 2 classes. plus most clans on ps3 had just 3 mages for most of their matches and would only switch to 4 if stuck in a bad spot. but the other 4 were never all one class when that happened. and your point about mages preventing archers from doing anything. well you can say the same for archers preventing warriors and scouts from doing anything. a dumb point...
|
|
|
Post by Onde Aander on Sept 18, 2010 17:46:15 GMT -5
I've decided not to read the rest of this thread. Honestly, did I miss anything?
|
|
|
Post by |BLOD|Durin on Sept 18, 2010 17:51:38 GMT -5
A neverending discussion about which class is 'noob' and some discussion about tactics how to kills 'noobs' :/
|
|