|
Post by eternalagony on Oct 23, 2009 15:59:36 GMT -5
OMG CAPS LOCK IS ON BM, I MUST BE HAVING AN ULCER.
You do know caps is just a text expression, right. Your not physically goin through stress or upset. Just wanted to help you out BM, you sound confused between chat lingo, and real life.
|
|
|
Post by eternalagony on Oct 23, 2009 16:05:48 GMT -5
way to much drama going on. i really had a good time till dram started then everyone had an opinion about something when the leaders could have decide the faith of whatever was going on at the time . again i have beef with no one i just enjoy playing this game. so if anything if a dispute shows up the leaders should chat then tell us what s going on it will be much simpler but anyhow back to the challenge hopefully im on and we all have fun jberube, Ive always thought you were a class act and still do. I have NO hard feelings towards you shit there goes that damn caps lock again.
|
|
|
Post by BulgarianMenace on Oct 23, 2009 16:15:53 GMT -5
And text remediates speech. Don't understand? Too bad, look it up.
|
|
|
Post by Pookz on Oct 23, 2009 16:17:59 GMT -5
DONT DO IT EA DONT DO ITTTTT
|
|
|
Post by BulgarianMenace on Oct 23, 2009 16:24:19 GMT -5
Yes, by this point you've effectuated a change in your usage of caps. Nice attempt at a smokescreen, but it doesn't make my initial point any less correct.
Not to mention that your repeated replies continue to reinforce the fact that you do care, contrary to whatever you might say (or type, if you prefer).
Take broly for example. Broly, you say? What does he have to do with anything? Well obviously he doesn't give a rats ass (or a mangled dick) because he hasn't posted, if he's even bothered to read this thread. He doesn't care, but you do.
|
|
|
Post by rizen33 on Oct 23, 2009 16:29:34 GMT -5
Just curious why did you guys start late during that mount doom ctr? I don't think we necessarily started early, but rather started on time, right after the warm-up countdown. I too apologize, I was completely focused on helping the team capture the ring and didn't know some of you guys weren't ready. If so like Strider said, I believe at least one person could have said something in chat. The score was 2 to 0 for that match, so even if that first capture didn't count due to an early/late start, it still would be 1 to 0. Regarding using Gandalf, it probably should have been a DQ (or an automtic round loss). I thought it was pretty nice on our part to instead agree upon making the round invalid instead (also that our team didn't use the troll on that level). After Gandalf, some of our team members weren't giving it 100% for that next capture (I know for me anyways especially since Straitcash had agreed on making that round invalid as well in chat). Again regardless, I think you guys did really well overall. I was really impressed with Sam during the Minas ctr match. I know some of you guys may not want any rules period like Amaced, if so let's include HTDM matches in the tournament and you guys go evil every round.
|
|
|
Post by ALM1GHTY_AMACED on Oct 23, 2009 16:34:02 GMT -5
I know some of you guys may not want any rules period like Amaced, if so let's include HTDM matches in the tournament and you guys go evil every round. That is fine with us Rizen we will go evil every round on htdm.
|
|
|
Post by BulgarianMenace on Oct 23, 2009 16:35:33 GMT -5
I'm definitely not playing any htdm. And they're not playing ctr. We can't have just 2 modes (tdm and conquest) because if we split then no one wins.
Therefore I'm ok with jus tdm. For me it's either that or tdm, conuest, and ctr, but NOT htdm.
|
|
|
Post by Pookz on Oct 23, 2009 16:37:25 GMT -5
i care for ea, *****
|
|
|
Post by rizen33 on Oct 23, 2009 16:39:09 GMT -5
Yea about HTDM, it was sarcasm on my part to stress the importance of rules to make things fair and balance in formal matches like tournaments/clan matches, didn't think he or anyone would have actually agreed to it.
|
|
|
Post by BulgarianMenace on Oct 23, 2009 16:42:43 GMT -5
I think he took it seriously though
|
|
|
Post by King of the Pink Mushrooms on Oct 23, 2009 16:59:04 GMT -5
I know that this is none of my business, but this is how I think the rules should go, it may not be the most fair way, but it is much easier to to enforce and for most of the rules only the clan leaders need to be informed about them.
Here they are;
•Matches are played in a mix server – (HTDM does not count unless one team lives for it).
•1st match does not count – considered a warm up match for people to join. •One team is good for whole battle thing, other team is evil.
•Heroes allowed (too hard to force)
•It the teams responsibility to make sure there player notify if there leaving so a replacement can come in as soon as he leaves. •Max of 2 players from outside clan.
•All maps count
•If a random gets it in everyone leaves for a new server next round, the current round still counts. •If your teams lack numbers, that’s their fault, if randoms come in and join the other team, the other clan members won’t be forced to join the other side leaving you out numbered.
Also all maps played count, no counter picking to much time wasting and all maps in the server all played to get a fair variety of maps.
|
|
|
Post by BulgarianMenace on Oct 23, 2009 17:08:14 GMT -5
Counter picking does not take long; it was quick enough in our war with tcf.
Heroes are easy to "force."
There's no reason one side should be good and the other evil throughout since it can easily be changed in chat. That's what chat is for.
All maps counting is just dumb. It's clear that there are several maps which are just flawed and unbalanced in a number of ways.
There's no point in having a warm up match; so long as no one chooses a side and just sits in the server until they get the go ahead in the chat it should be fine. Again, that's what the chat is for.
I'm cool with the other stuff.
|
|
|
Post by King of the Pink Mushrooms on Oct 23, 2009 17:17:42 GMT -5
I guess some maps should not be counted, but try to keep it minimal.
The reason why a I think a warm up match is a good idea is because its only one game but it avoids alot of arguments which comes with the match. The same goes with heroes there have been so many arguments centered around them, but I can see why you would want them banned.
|
|
|
Post by rizen33 on Oct 23, 2009 17:26:10 GMT -5
I think too having a clear leader would be helpful for future clan matches. If there's no official leader of the clan, maybe temporarily have the clan vote or agree upon a temporary leader or a captain for the matches. For instance, after the Gandalf incident, Straightcash said quite a few times in chat that the round should be invalid. I assumed he was the clan leader and what he said represented the official decision of his clan; however of course, some on his clan members seemed to disregard his statements (and maybe this applies to some of our members as well perhaps due to confusion of who was the leader or official voice of TCF during the match).
|
|