|
Post by Mithrand!r on Dec 26, 2010 12:35:27 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by |BLOD|Durin on Dec 26, 2010 13:14:07 GMT -5
Oh yeah Daroo is indeed a die-hard warrior ^^
But in the past we had Huispring as warrior and scout, not to mention Kuma ^^
Me and Frei as mage those were lovely times ^^
But i started a lot of warrior practising months ago ^^ And i almost forget about Tonki, he had amazing archer-skills and his conn should be banned as well lol! Hosted for 16 people, fluent connection!
|
|
|
Post by straightcash5 on Dec 26, 2010 19:36:26 GMT -5
i like how the PC players actually judge a warrior by how good they were in full servers. it seemed on PS3 that most warriors were always judged by how good they were in 1v1's, that and if you were one of the first players to get good with warrior (and any class really), you would always be considered one of the best even if you didn't get much better and other players surpassed you.
|
|
|
Post by Istari on Dec 26, 2010 20:10:57 GMT -5
Tbh it was (and it's always) same for us... there're still some players to say "bwa, 1v1 mens nothing..." : no. If a warrior (or any class) beats everyone in a duel, it's cause he knows a lot of tricks and combos, and he'll can do it again on the battlefield, (8v8, etc.)
The contrary isn't exact : someone can be good on 8v8 cause it's a big melee and he can have some easy kill, few good mates... it doesn't mean at all he plays his class divinely.
|
|
|
Post by straightcash5 on Dec 26, 2010 20:53:30 GMT -5
i agree. for warrior 1v1 definitely shows who has more skill. but that doesn't necessarily make one warrior better then another. like nexsus for example (ps3 player) wasn't the best or top 5 among the best 1v1 warriors. but in a full server i can't remember a warrior who was more effective then he was, but he wasn't considered a top 5 warrior.
|
|
|
Post by Taco on Dec 26, 2010 23:23:47 GMT -5
lol in 8v8 u fight differently than u would in a dual. like when theres archers snipinnscouts going for backstabs,etc. unless its like a nice clanwar, i enjoy duals much more, as many of u know, especially angelus xD.
|
|
|
Post by BulgarianMenace on Dec 27, 2010 1:19:21 GMT -5
1v1 shows how good you are at playing your class. 8v8 shows how good you are at playing the game.
|
|
|
Post by straightcash5 on Dec 27, 2010 2:02:40 GMT -5
1v1 shows how good you are at playing your class. 8v8 shows how good you are at playing the game. ah, couldn't have worded it better
|
|
|
Post by BulgarianMenace on Dec 27, 2010 2:54:55 GMT -5
Although, of course, 8v8 can also just show how good/bad your team/the other team is. In 1v1 at least you know the result is based of your skill only.
|
|
|
Post by |BLOD|Durin on Dec 27, 2010 4:38:13 GMT -5
+1 Menace
|
|
|
Post by Istari on Dec 27, 2010 6:24:13 GMT -5
Well summarized.
|
|
-=TLF=-Gothmog
UglĂșk
"Fight like a Warrior, to show skills and honor"
Posts: 349
|
Post by -=TLF=-Gothmog on Dec 27, 2010 9:30:42 GMT -5
Yeah, really good explanation to which I agree 8vs8 depend by a lot of things btw, how the player approach it usually in normal games (i was used to a lot of times alone in normal games, to increase my 1vsmore skills, and it was also the best training to increase your reflexes, speed etc.) or how he approach it in a serious match, that means if the player go for teamwork or for solo. I loved to do both the things, different fun for each one. Obviously in clanwars i was for the team only.
|
|
|
Post by Taco on Dec 27, 2010 10:38:19 GMT -5
not always alone ^^ XD sometimes i just followed you everywhere and steal your kills as scout. warrior and scout is a great duo =) you dont play as much anymore so i chose another good warrior to pick on: angelus XD
|
|
|
Post by Angelus on Dec 27, 2010 10:59:58 GMT -5
so i chose another good warrior to pick on: angelus XD lol
|
|
|
Post by Taco on Dec 27, 2010 11:20:59 GMT -5
consider it a compliment XD
|
|