|
Post by Angelus on Jan 9, 2011 8:47:46 GMT -5
lol, Psx isn't just a console clan anymore. we have some pc players
|
|
|
Post by Mithrand!r on Jan 9, 2011 9:47:58 GMT -5
for me best rule is no class limit. period. and btw, what fair game said wasnt that ridiculous - at least the conclusion, what means last sentence - so, +1 for what you said It is true that if u guys have the best warriors creating a limit class of 1 for mages and archers turns things kinda unfair for the team that has only 1 or 2 good warriors, having in consideration that whatever people say or not warriors are the strongest class in the game - of course needing a good support and all of that -. I suggest we make this clan battle in a time both clans have 8 members available so if u guys want a limit class at least it turns things a little bit more equlibrated... Anyway think we need to train a little more as a team with the old and new members so it cant probably be that soon
|
|
|
Post by morgoth on Jan 9, 2011 10:50:47 GMT -5
bah we dont hav e8 members
|
|
|
Post by Mithrand!r on Jan 9, 2011 10:57:12 GMT -5
6 is the max u have?
|
|
|
Post by morgoth on Jan 9, 2011 11:08:11 GMT -5
yop and we dont see any potencial player to let them join
|
|
|
Post by Mithrand!r on Jan 9, 2011 11:14:13 GMT -5
Yeah...thats the problem of an entire elite team...the requirement to join turns to high. Anyway, in that case, i suggest we do a limit of 2 mages/2 archers or, if you guys don't agree, like it was suggested before 2archers/1mage or 2mages/1archer as the team choses in the required situation.
|
|
|
Post by [ROJOES]ronjons on Jan 9, 2011 11:15:02 GMT -5
6v6 then 2 mage & 2 archer cap per team , else its going to be magespam, level fully carpeted with firewall if 8v8 then 3 mage 2 archer or 2 mage 3 archer cap
|
|
|
Post by Lumy ' -=TLF=- on Jan 9, 2011 11:27:49 GMT -5
yop and we dont see any potencial player to let them join If arrogance makes blind
|
|
|
Post by morgoth on Jan 9, 2011 11:32:31 GMT -5
have i ever been arrogant? i dont remember...
|
|
|
Post by Lumy ' -=TLF=- on Jan 9, 2011 11:33:16 GMT -5
;D As if i thought about your humble self
|
|
|
Post by Istari on Jan 9, 2011 11:40:29 GMT -5
More than one mage in 6v6 is just imba cause of their support... plus with ring, it's just unplayable. 2 archers why not... but 2 mages, sure not.
|
|
|
Post by Mithrand!r on Jan 9, 2011 11:44:34 GMT -5
Its unplayable for both sides. And here we come again with the story of two archer why not, mages, sure not. Full of shits. 2/2 or 2/1 each team choses think its the most fair
|
|
|
Post by morgoth on Jan 9, 2011 12:13:54 GMT -5
i wont agree on 4vs4^^
|
|
|
Post by [ROJOES]ronjons on Jan 9, 2011 12:18:56 GMT -5
4 v 4 doesnt interest me. 8v8 most enjoyable
|
|
|
Post by morgoth on Jan 9, 2011 12:24:17 GMT -5
6vs6 and more for me
|
|