|
Post by straightcash5 on Nov 17, 2010 12:37:40 GMT -5
well i did beat you once and you were a top 3 warrior, i was somewhere in the 8-12 range. but style matchups do make a difference with 1v1 warriors, i completely forgot about it. i was really good with landing my axe throws a high percentage of the time. i was also really good at avoiding opponent axe's. thats prolly why i was able to do good against you, since you normally wouldn't come in often without landing a axe first, because you were better then i was at stringing together combo's. so style matchup definitely matters more in 1v1 warrior matches since it's much more hard to adapt to another warriors style then it is for a mage to adapt to another mages style, since there is only a few diferent styles a mage could use. but thats also why it is so impressive that some mages would consistently win by a good margin, being that it was easier to adapt to another mages style, but they would still win by alot.
|
|
|
Post by straightcash5 on Nov 17, 2010 12:47:09 GMT -5
your prolly right though, warrior prolly was a little bit harder to be great, with all the different styles you had to master.
but the top mages definitely were more dominant over the rest of the good ones then the top warriors were. but style matchups definitely did make the seperation from the top 5 warriors compared to everyone else seem like they weren't to much better, even though they were.
but it could also be that there was more effort put in by more people to become a good 1v1 warrior then there was to become a good mage
|
|
|
Post by BulgarianMenace on Nov 17, 2010 13:29:27 GMT -5
You beat me because I didn't give a shit about your warrior so I was fucking around.
Not only that, but I was actually pretty bad at warrior back then. I got way better after coming to pc.
The fact is mages are simple, warriors are complex. Therefore it is harder to master the warrior class and be dominant with it.
|
|
|
Post by straightcash5 on Nov 17, 2010 16:11:14 GMT -5
broly was the only dominant warrior there was, so i guess it may have been harder to be a dominant warrior.
as for what you give a shit about i could care less. and i beat you in like february. and right around that time you were sayin the same thing you are now, so... and you weren't fuckin around, you hated losing to anyone, and you were playin like you always did... alot of runnin. you always got some excuse.
|
|
|
Post by ClearNote on Nov 17, 2010 16:12:50 GMT -5
Can we NOT turn this into an argument!? I smell one. . .just a little bit, though.
|
|
|
Post by BulgarianMenace on Nov 17, 2010 16:15:00 GMT -5
lol you forgot already? You insisted on that warrior 1v1 because you were bored of mage 1v1ing. So I indulged you, but I didn't give a shit and I wasn't trying. You want get on pc I'll be happy to mash your face in so you can see what I mean.
|
|
|
Post by straightcash5 on Nov 17, 2010 16:23:11 GMT -5
i bet you weren't tough guy. but you played the same way as always. so keep givin your bs excuses.
i'm sure just about any warrior would crush me if i got on a pc and played...
i know you were a better warrior then me, and you act like i'm saying that i think i'm a better warrior, i know i'm not.
|
|
|
Post by BulgarianMenace on Nov 17, 2010 16:34:25 GMT -5
You're the one who brought it up. Just because I was loosely playing the way I played (at the time) doesn't mean I was focused or particularly interested. But if it makes you feel better about yourself to think that I was trying then by all means go ahead. Though I find it hilarious that you're trying to tell me you know better than I do if I was or not.
Not only that, but if I did care don't you think I would have demanded a rematch like I did with our mage 1v1? Think about it for a sec. I never wanted a rematch. Obviously I didn't give a shit about your warrior.
|
|
|
Post by straightcash5 on Nov 17, 2010 16:54:35 GMT -5
you did ask... you said, are you sure that you don't wan't to do another one of either class
you are right, you didn't demand one. but thats because you knew you were better so it wasn't a big deal for you to want a rematch that badly.
also, if you remember i was doing alot of, i can't remember the word for it, but i was blocking-sliding and trying to catch you with a O L1O alot during that match. jenaez had helped me with it beforehand andi was trying to get better at it, i wasn't exactly playing the same way i normally would either. but either way you were a better warrior then me and should've beat me rather you were playing around or not. so yea, i definitely am glad that i won, i wasn't an elite warrior. not many warriors ever beat you on ps3.
|
|
|
Post by BulgarianMenace on Nov 17, 2010 17:55:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Joppi on Nov 17, 2010 19:00:24 GMT -5
I killed BM as a mage once
:x
|
|
|
Post by straightcash5 on Nov 17, 2010 19:37:36 GMT -5
I killed BM as a mage once :x man that was funny
|
|
|
Post by ALM1GHTY_AMACED on Nov 17, 2010 22:40:13 GMT -5
Hi BM and joppi can you two play tomorrow?
|
|