|
Post by Crusader_878 on Mar 9, 2010 20:07:39 GMT -5
Well, you guys have your opinions and we have ours. You say we had a sub in Nexsus, but you fail to realize that we didn't have our best 8 playing (no offense to our team mates that played). AntoN7-96, RevoltSeith both elite scout and warrior respectively. Plus, cheesestar91 --our best scout-- didn't play at all in TDM. Once again, I feel this could have gone either way.
|
|
|
Post by BulgarianMenace on Mar 9, 2010 20:17:25 GMT -5
CTR [pellenor]:lisa, untow, wottes - archer coy, ouphe, cat - mage (cat on horseback) fleur - scout/mage (alternates) foxy - warrior we never had more than 4 mages. it's there in the vids. don't aggrandize. LOL. Bullshit. I wasn't paying strict attention to the number of mages in the rest of the matches, but I know for a fact that in the last game on pellenor you had 6-7 mages at one point. As you're already said, coy, fleur, cat, and yourself played mage at various points. That makes 4 already. Lisa and wotts also played mage at least one life for sure. I remember for wotts joppi commented over mic that she stopped playing archer for some reason. Foxy may have played mage, but I could be wrong and just mistaking her for someone else. So 6, maybe 7. Then again, it doesn't really matter since we destroyed you either way.
|
|
|
Post by straightcash5 on Mar 9, 2010 20:17:34 GMT -5
well when you say that we had more and we didn't it pissed me off. i hope he did record it, to prove i'm right.
also if you didn't COUNT how many mages there were then you wouldn't be able to say we had more
|
|
|
Post by Mithrand!r on Mar 9, 2010 20:27:18 GMT -5
When i look into two houses, i can say without COUNTING wich one has more people. It's an hability that is not that hard to get. I don't need to say that house A has, for example, 5 persons and that house B has 10 persons. Conclusion - 10 » 5 - House B is the winner. I think we are all big people here, so i tought that the affirmation that i did was clear for others to understand , but since ''NOT COUNTING'' takes out all the credibility of what i said, don't worry, next time i'll do it more explicit. But ok, we both have our point of views, no need for more argue.
|
|
|
Post by Crusader_878 on Mar 9, 2010 20:35:03 GMT -5
When i look into two houses, i can say without COUNTING wich one has more people. It's an hability that is not that hard to get. I don't need to say that house A has, for example, 5 persons and that house B has 10 persons. Conclusion - 10 » 5 - House B is the winner. I think we are all big people here, so i tought that the affirmation that i did was clear for others to understand , but since ''NOT COUNTING'' takes out all the credibility of what i said, don't worry, next time i'll do it more explicit. But ok, we both have our point of views, no need for more argue. looool, good one buddy.
|
|
|
Post by ouphe on Mar 9, 2010 20:35:42 GMT -5
CTR [pellenor]:lisa, untow, wottes - archer coy, ouphe, cat - mage (cat on horseback) fleur - scout/mage (alternates) foxy - warrior we never had more than 4 mages. it's there in the vids. don't aggrandize. LOL. Bullshit. I wasn't paying strict attention to the number of mages in the rest of the matches, but I know for a fact that in the last game on pellenor you had 6-7 mages at one point. As you're already said, coy, fleur, cat, and yourself played mage at various points. That makes 4 already. Lisa and wotts also played mage at least one life for sure. I remember for wotts joppi commented over mic that she stopped playing archer for some reason. Foxy may have played mage, but I could be wrong and just mistaking her for someone else. So 6, maybe 7. Then again, it doesn't really matter since we destroyed you either way. like I said, it's in the vids. I watched each closely. care to find these instances? untow and foxy never went mage. even if this happened (I severely doubt it did), it was brief and insignificant enough to not be noticed - likely when TM7 was about to capture. and one life equals magespam? oookay. you shouted 'GO MAGE' in your clan chat as we approached your base at pelly - it's the same thing. the vast majority of the time we had 3-4 mages, same as you. it matters if you make up bullshit, regardless of the outcome.
|
|
|
Post by BulgarianMenace on Mar 9, 2010 20:37:43 GMT -5
we had two mages and amaced either couldn't hear me on the mic or wasn't listening so I told him via chat to go mage.
And it was magespam for the duration that you had 6 mages out. It clearly wasn't very effective though, which only goes to show that magespam is not a broken tactic.
|
|
|
Post by straightcash5 on Mar 9, 2010 20:51:44 GMT -5
i don't want to argue, just stating that we never had more mages
|
|
|
Post by Crusader_878 on Mar 9, 2010 21:04:53 GMT -5
i don't want to argue, just stating that we never had more mages I don't know who had more mages. However, it certainly seemed that you guys had just as many mages as we did. That's why I had to switch from warrior to mage.
|
|
|
Post by ALM1GHTY_AMACED on Mar 9, 2010 21:12:13 GMT -5
Then again, it doesn't really matter since we destroyed you either way. and one life equals magespam? oookay. you shouted 'GO MAGE' in your clan chat as we approached your base at pelly - it's the same thing. the vast majority of the time we had 3-4 mages, same as you. it matters if you make up bullshit, regardless of the outcome. BM was talking to me because I played as archer not knowing we are short on Mage if you rewind and watch it again you will see "amaced" then "go Mage"........For some reason I couldn't here anybody on the mic........
|
|
|
Post by jenaez on Mar 9, 2010 21:23:15 GMT -5
and one life equals magespam? oookay. you shouted 'GO MAGE' in your clan chat as we approached your base at pelly - it's the same thing. the vast majority of the time we had 3-4 mages, same as you. it matters if you make up bullshit, regardless of the outcome. BM was talking to me if you rewind and watch it again you will see "amaced" then "go Mage"........For some reason I couldn't here anybody on the mic........ If you see the video i say : "we need another mage", bcuz EVOD had atleast 5 mage clusterfucking with the ring bearer (btw im not saying that wasnt a legit strategy) and we only had 2: bm and bauer, after that bm wrote : "amaced" and "go mage" Another thing, in that match we never had more than 3 mages: bm, bauer, amaced: mage joppi, fob, amaced(only 4 a moment): archer cronhzero, nexus(also scout): warrior jenaez, nexus(also warrior): scout
|
|
|
Post by AznLisa23 on Mar 9, 2010 22:06:54 GMT -5
lol, yeah. It's funny how some clans complain all day about mage spam and then when it comes down to it they do it themselves. Like when TM7 faced evod yesterday, there were some moments when they were definitely 6-7 mages and 1-2 archers. Ummm, why bring us into this? Did I complain lately about mage spam? Who cares how many mages there were? Isn't this why there wasn't a mage cap, that you enforced? Also, I don't think I ever "went mage", I went warrior and scout a couple times. Hmm and the only people that were mages the entire time was Coy and Ouphe. But again, what difference does it make. And yes you destroyed us, but I'm glad Joppi posted the videos. It clearly shows that we were even in TDM until after the 30 mark or so, until you spawn camped us in both maps. Not saying its not "fair" or anything, just showed me on video what I had suspected. GGs and it was a "learning experience" LOL. I think we fought well even if we didn't win. Worth fighting at least...contrary to what you told your team. Also the matches, I must say were handled professionally and smoothly for the most part. It was nice playing a clan that had their shit together mostly.
|
|
|
Post by straightcash5 on Mar 9, 2010 22:44:28 GMT -5
your funny lol
|
|
|
Post by ouphe on Mar 9, 2010 22:47:43 GMT -5
BM was talking to me if you rewind and watch it again you will see "amaced" then "go Mage"........For some reason I couldn't here anybody on the mic........ If you see the video i say : "we need another mage", bcuz EVOD had atleast 5 mage clusterfucking with the ring bearer (btw im not saying that wasnt a legit strategy) and we only had 2: bm and bauer, after that bm wrote : "amaced" and "go mage" Another thing, in that match we never had more than 3 mages: bm, bauer, amaced: mage joppi, fob, amaced(only 4 a moment): archer cronhzero, nexus(also scout): warrior jenaez, nexus(also warrior): scout during the point you're referencing (around 4:15 - CTR 2 Part 1), EVOD only had 3 mages: me, coy & cat. lisa, wottes & untow get kills with arrows, fleur backstabs 2 people & foxy kills crohn with an axe. wottes goes mage at the first capture (for 2 minutes), then switches to warrior (around 4:15 - CTR 2 Part 2). that makes a grand total of 5 mages (one of which was riding around) for 2 minutes (during 2 captures) in a 16 minute match - never 6 or 7. when I said '3-4 mages the majority of the time,' I was referencing the entire tournament, not just that match.
|
|
|
Post by BulgarianMenace on Mar 9, 2010 23:05:24 GMT -5
And yes you destroyed us, but I'm glad Joppi posted the videos. It clearly shows that we were even in TDM until after the 30 mark or so, until you spawn camped us in both maps. Not saying its not "fair" or anything, just showed me on video what I had suspected. That may be your explanation for it, but it's not the way I saw it. In rivendell you guys clustered at your spawn and waited for us to come to you. We did, but because it was our first time ever playing tdm together we weren't very coordinated and we got off to a poor start. Your team had the advantage of experience in that situation. Once we got things together we rolled. Then on osgiliath we mainly fought on the bridge, which both teams have a spawn on. And since we got warmed up and used to playing tdm together we had no problems. what is this I dont even
|
|