|
|
Post by BulgarianMenace on Jan 29, 2010 19:56:48 GMT -5
Class: Warrior vs Warrior
Format: No respawns
Result: 10-8 BulgarianMenace
BM's comments: It was a close match throughout. Started off 3-3, then he got 2 in a row to make it 5-3, then I went on a 4-1 streak to pull ahead 7-6, then he tied it up again 7-7, before I pulled ahead for good.
Class: Mage vs Mage
Result: 15-6 BulgarianMenace
BM's comments: He wanted to practice his mage so I agreed. He's not bad at all, just needs more practice.
|
|
|
|
Post by jenaez on Jan 29, 2010 20:31:27 GMT -5
Good game BM, my risky way to use the warrior dont work with your strategy and also you hit me with all the your axes lol, ill be ready the next time we fight  ..... And with mage im still thinking i sucks, but i really surprise you in our little "warmup" before the fight, i surprised myself to LOL..... |
|
|
|
Post by Onde Aander on Feb 1, 2010 8:13:13 GMT -5
BM ruins us with patience, jenaez. We're aggressive & bold and he knows it. I think I'd handle his strategy better than I used to.. maybe I'll put some more time into ps3 so I can have another go.
|
|
|
|
Post by jenaez on Feb 1, 2010 9:54:43 GMT -5
Yeah his game style is defensive, that make his oponent make stupid errors.more than one time i end attacking the air like an idiot and he headshot me with his axe, imo his strategy is really good and really work for him but the next time ill win |
|
|
|
Post by BulgarianMenace on Feb 1, 2010 18:31:15 GMT -5
You know burzum I'm tired of you talking shit. The direct implication in your statement is that you think I'm worse than you and jenaez and others and I manage to win with less skill by boring my opponent to the point that they lose concentration and make mistakes.
Stop being so fucking butthurt that I beat you (over and over again). My style is just as legit as any other style. And if you can't beat it that's because I'm simply better than you. Case and point: broly rapes me and my style because he's better than me. If you were better you would do the same.
|
|
|
|
Post by Onde Aander on Feb 2, 2010 8:42:05 GMT -5
You obviously have the skill to fight clean, which is why I give you so much crap. I acknowledge your skill but I don't respect your style or attitude. It takes more than beating me to earn my respect (not that you're interested). It's like Vhoscythe said after he fought you: "I never run. I am a knight!". I play for the moments when I outsmart my opponent and can look him in the eye as I finish him. You play to win. I haven't seen you play archer but I'll bet you're one of those guys who runs straight for the hobbit hill.
But I do have to hand it to you for this: You're always willing to put your money where your mouth is. I do respect that. And sometimes, whether you intend it or not, you're pretty funny. I daresay I'd like ya if you weren't so busy picking arguments.
|
|
|
|
Post by BulgarianMenace on Feb 2, 2010 9:15:48 GMT -5
Those two things aren't mutually exclusive. In fact, they go hand in hand. You don't win if you don't outsmart your opponent.
I beat you. Extrapolate from there.
You're just mad because I don't adhere to your arbitrary code of "honor."
what is this i dont even
|
|
|
|
Post by Onde Aander on Feb 2, 2010 12:30:05 GMT -5
If you play like a coward you win but you don't get to look your opponent in the face. As an example, if you run up and backstab an archer who is zoomed and not paying attention, you win a kill and it's his own fault for not watching for scouts, but you would hardly yell out "pwned!". And no, I'm not "mad" that you don't play with honor, I just don't respect cheap tactics, especially in a 1v1.
The hobbit hill = the hill at the back of the map in the Shire (across the bridge). I have colorful words for archers who camp it.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheLegendaryBroly on Feb 2, 2010 13:46:04 GMT -5
If you play like a coward you win but you don't get to look your opponent in the face. As an example, if you run up and backstab an archer who is zoomed and not paying attention, you win a kill and it's his own fault for not watching for scouts, but you would hardly yell out "pwned!". And no, I'm not "mad" that you don't play with honor, I just don't respect cheap tactics, especially in a 1v1. The hobbit hill = the hill at the back of the map in the Shire (across the bridge). I have colorful words for archers who camp it. ^ i do all of that  |
|
|
|
Post by Strider on Feb 2, 2010 16:45:05 GMT -5
If you play like a coward you win but you don't get to look your opponent in the face. I understand what you're trying to say and I agree that players who back-pedal, and run all over the map are annoying. However, if you can't overcome and beat your opponent at their game...whose fault is that? Like BM said, Broly kicks his ass regardless of how he plays. Why? Because Broly is a better a warrior. He knows how to counter and stifle BM's approach. You call his style cowardly, yet I think that's just frustration speaking. It sounds like you just want your opponent to stand like a statue and exchange melee/combo attacks. This reminds me of the people who call Lyoto Machida (MMA fighter) cowardly for having a defensive, pick-your-spot style. Is it cowardly or do you just not have what it takes to overcome it? Seems that you're just sour over your inability to adapt. You keep hiding behind this superfluous (in my opinion) honor code that you expect all to adhere to. If that's how you (and other 360 players) play, I can respect that. I just think it's unfair to call others cheap or cowardly for having techniques that best your own. What I consider cheap and cowardly (in 1v1's) are things like spawn camping or not sticking to an agreed upon way of fighting. |
|
|
|
Post by Onde Aander on Feb 3, 2010 6:06:42 GMT -5
What I consider cheap and cowardly (in 1v1's) are things like spawn camping or not sticking to an agreed upon way of fighting. Glad someone agrees with me on that point. If I'm beaten by a player who fights with honor, I congratulate him. If he fights dirty, I call him a coward whether he beats me or not. I can't stand losing to a coward. I will be back for more. Both times I've faced BM warrior vs warrior he's beaten me fair and square - but it's always been on his turf with his rules (when we played by my rules he decided to break them halfway through the match anyway) so I don't think the "who's better" talk is warranted just yet. I'll put some time into PS3 if you wanna see some shit . (Lol there goes my mouth again...) |
|
|
|
Post by BulgarianMenace on Feb 3, 2010 8:44:36 GMT -5
well from what I've gathered you ain't hot shit on the 360 either.
|
|
|
|
Post by Onde Aander on Feb 3, 2010 9:18:26 GMT -5
Never said I was. MK leaderboard is pretty accurate though, for those of us who still play. Guy above me won by 1 kill, guy below me lost by 1.
|
|
|
|
Post by BulgarianMenace on Feb 3, 2010 9:39:51 GMT -5
I don't think the "who's better" talk is warranted just yet. I'll put some time into PS3 if you wanna see some shit . (Lol there goes my mouth again...) |
|
|
|
Post by Onde Aander on Feb 3, 2010 14:47:13 GMT -5
Oh god, here comes the quote war. I can't be bothered to search my own posts but I do recall saying several times things like "I'm not really a prime example of Xbox warriorship", "I'm not even top 10 on Xbox" etc. I also recall what you said after the first time we fought (you beat me 10-7): "Well at least I learned one thing - that Xbox warriors are better than PS3". Remember that? Give me a week to sharpen my blade, then I want to see you in the Rivendell waterfall, standard Mithril Knights match rules. No leaving the ring, no spawn camping, and no whining about the respawn rule. |
|
..... And with mage im still thinking i sucks, but i really surprise you in our little "warmup" before the fight, i surprised myself to LOL..... 
